ConceptRelationStructure

Package: 
Extends: 
Version: 
1
Is Abstract: 
no
Is Pattern: 
no
Definition: 

Relation structure of concepts within a collection.

Property: 
NameCardinalityDatatypeDescription
hasRelationSpecification
1..1
Provides information on reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetry of relationship using a descriptive term from an ennumeration list. Use if all relations within this relation structure are of the same specification.
semantic
0..1
Provides semantic context for the relationship
totality
0..1
Type of relation in terms of totality with respect to an associated collection.
hasMemberRelation
0..n
Restricted to ConceptRelation. ConceptRelations making up the relation structure.
Relationship: 
NameTarget ObjectDescriptionSource cardinalityTarget cardinalityRelationship type
realizes
Collection pattern class realized by this class
0..n
0..1
Neither

Stage:

Is extendable: 
Is property: 
0
RDF Mapping: 

Comments

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Flavio Rizzolo wrote:

I think the only ones that extend Identifiable are the pairs, e.g.ParentChildPair, etc. That's because they are simple objects that would be to heavy to annotate. As far as I know, all others should extend AnnotatedIdentifiable, including ConceptParentChild.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Wendy Thomas wrote:

In reviewing conceptual I noted that ConceptSystem has a relationship to ConceptParentChild. This in itself has no extension base and no identification. Should ConceptParentChild have an extension base of Identifiable or AnnotatedIdentifiable???