ConceptSystem

Package: 
Version: 
1
Is Abstract: 
no
Is Pattern: 
no
Definition: 

A set of Concepts structured by the relations among them. [GSIM 1.1]

Explanatory Notes: 

Note that this structure can be used to structure Concept, Classification, Universe, Population, Unit Type and any other class that extends from Concept.

Example: 
1) Concept of Sex: Male, Female, Other 2) Concept of Household Relationship: Household Head, Spouse of Household Head, Child of Household Head, Unrelated Household Member, etc.
Property: 
NameCardinalityDatatypeDescription
type
0..1
Whether the collection is a bag or a set: a bag is a collection with duplicates allowed, a set is a collection without duplicates.
name
0..n
A linguistic signifier. Human understandable name (word, phrase, or mnemonic) that reflects the ISO/IEC 11179-5 naming principles. If more than one name is provided provide a context to differentiate usage.
purpose
0..1
Explanation of the intent of some decision or object. Supports the use of multiple languages and structured text.
contains
0..n
MemberIndicator Allows for the identification of the member and optionally provides an index for the member within an ordered array
isOrdered
0..1
If members are ordered set to true, if unordered set to false.
Relationship: 
NameTarget ObjectDescriptionSource cardinalityTarget cardinalityRelationship type
isStructuredBy
A structure containing specific relationships between members of the collection.
0..n
0..n
Neither
realizes
realizes the collection pattern
0..n
1..1
Neither
definingConcept
The conceptual basis for the collection of members.
0..n
0..n
Neither
DDI 3.2: 
c:ConceptSchemeType
Is extendable: 
GSIM: 
Concept System
Is property: 
0
RDF Mapping: 

Comments

Probably not. It never should have been, actually (I think).
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Wendy Thomas wrote:
Should ConceptSystem still be abstract?