ContentDateOffset

Is Abstract: 
no
Is Pattern: 
no
Definition: 

Identifies the difference between the date applied to the data as a whole and this specific item such as previous year's income or residence 5 years ago. A value of true for the attribute isNegativeOffset indicates that the offset is the specified number of declared units prior to the date of the data as a whole and false indicates information regarding a future state.

Property: 
NameCardinalityDatatypeDescription
numberOfUnits
0..1
The number of units to off-set the date for this item expressed as a decimal.
isNegativeOffset
0..1
If set to "true" the date is offset the number of units specified PRIOR to the default date of the data. A setting of "false" indicates a date the specified number of units in the FUTURE from the default date of the data.
Relationship: 

Stage:

DDI 3.2: 
r:ContentDateOffsetType
Is extendable: 
Is property: 
1
RDF Mapping: 

Comments

Rather than extending CodeValueType, wouldn't it be more flexible to create a property "unit"?

why does this extend an external controlled vocabulary entry? The documentation is from 3.2 so doesn't address this