TopicalCoverageDEPRECATED

Package: 
Version: 
1
Is Abstract: 
yes
Is Pattern: 
no
Definition: 

Describes the topics (categories) related to some object.

Example: 
Keywords describing a study
Synonyms: 
r:TopicalCoverage
Property: 
Relationship: 
NameTarget ObjectDescriptionSource cardinalityTarget cardinalityRelationship type
providesTopicalCoverageFor
A Coverage includes a description of topics related to the object
0..1
0..n
Aggregation

Stage:

Is extendable: 
Is property: 
0
RDF Mapping: 

Comments

Given that these a) all get used in the same way, b) are differentiated by being a formal "structured" taxonomy, a formal "unstructured" taxonomy, an informal external taxonomy, or an informal internal term (no taxonomy), is it possible to have a single structure that allows for reference to the external and flags to indicate if its formal (defined content) / informal (undefined) and structured / unstructured. That way people don't have to guess which one to put it in and can simply identify an external source, then indicate if it is a formal listing and if its structured. Just a thought.