Revisions for Representation

RevisionTermsStatus
Saved 06/17/2019 - 21:48 by wendy

This class was returned to Package Keep as the content will be covered by another Library Package. Simple Codebook should only contain those classes specific to a Simple Codebook. A list of all moved classes will be posted as a comment on the package description so information is not lost.

Proposal current revision (published)
Saved 11/28/2014 - 13:13 by therese.lalor
Proposal archived
Saved 11/28/2014 - 12:34 by therese.lalor
Proposal archived
Saved 11/25/2014 - 17:40 by marcel
Proposal archived
Saved 11/25/2014 - 10:34 by marcel
Proposal archived
Saved 10/23/2014 - 16:52 by therese.lalor
Proposal archived
Saved 05/30/2014 - 21:25 by guillaume

This has been reviewed for consistency - Toronto. Not easy to give a definition for an abstract type, especially when first pulled from a DDI 3.2 abstract type.

Proposal archived
Saved 05/30/2014 - 20:18 by wendy
Proposal archived
Saved 05/30/2014 - 20:14 by wendy
Proposal archived
Saved 05/28/2014 - 17:36 by wendy
Proposal archived
Saved 05/28/2014 - 17:32 by wendy
Proposal archived
Saved 05/28/2014 - 16:48 by wendy
Proposal archived
Saved 05/28/2014 - 16:24 by steve
Proposal archived
Saved 05/23/2014 - 13:58 by ddi4
Proposal archived